The Corner House

Jump to main content | Jump to navigation menu


home | about | subjects | briefings | links | search | help | notifications | contact


Genetics

Transforming "Waste" into "Resource" From Women's Eggs to Economics for Women

by Sarah Sexton

presentation | published September 2005 | summary | full document | PDF

It is difficult to obtain enough human eggs from women for cloning research. This article explores the problems encountered; whether women should be paid for their eggs; the growing international trade in women's eggs; the concept of informed consent and choice; and the public money pouring into cloning research.

32. Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? Political Organising Behind TRIPS

by Peter Drahos with John Braithwaite

briefing | published September 2004 | summary | full document | PDF

When TRIPS was signed in 1994, the United States, Europe and Japan dominated the world's software, pharmaceutical, chemical and entertainment industries. The rest of the world had little to gain by agreeing to these terms of trade for intellectual property. They did so because a failure of democratic processes nationally and internationally enabled a small group of men within the United States to capture the US trade-agenda-setting process, to draft intellectual property principles that became the blueprint for TRIPS and to crush resistance through US trade power.

Deceptive Promises of Cures for Disease

by Sarah Sexton

article | published July/August 2002 | summary | full document

The great majority of the world's diseases are caused by environmental, not genetic, conditions. A frenzied search for genetic therapies could steal resources from billions in order to serve only a few.

Ethics or Economics? Public Health or Private Wealth?

by Sarah Sexton

article | published June 2002 | summary | full document

Economics, rather than improved health, is the underlying rationale for public and private support of human genetic research and technologies.

What’s in a Name? The Language and Discourse of Human Embryo Cloning

by Sarah Sexton

presentation | published 1-2 December 2001 | summary | full document

An analysis of the changing language used in discussions of human embryo cloning.

New Reproductive and Genetic Technologies International versus National Campaign Issues

by Sarah Sexton

presentation | published 24-27 May 2001 | summary | full document

Engineering of consent to human embryo cloning Why did the British Parliament change the law?

by Sarah Sexton

presentation | published 9-10 February 2001 | summary | full document

How to talk about cloning without talking about cloning Public discourse in the UK

by Sarah Sexton

article | published December 2000 | summary | full document

21. Genetic Dialectic The Biological Politics of Genetically Modified Trees

by Viola Sampson and Larry Lohmann

briefing | published December 2000 | summary | full document | PDF

16. If Cloning is the Answer, What was the Question? Power and Decision-Making in the Geneticisation of Health

by Sarah Sexton

briefing | published October 1999 | summary | full document | PDF

Most discussions about human embryo cloning focus on ethics and potential health benefits. In the process, the many social, economic and environmental aspects of health and disease are increasingly hidden, while issues such as how the potential benefits of biotech would be obtained and distributed are sidelined. It has therefore become hard to raise key questions about the increased geneticisation of our lives and societies.

Genetic Engineering in Agriculture Whose Risks? Whose Gains?

by Nicholas Hildyard

talk | published November 1998 | summary | full document

A summary of the ecological risks of genetic engineering in agriculture and suggestions for resisting its introduction.

10. Food? Health? Hope? Genetic Engineering and World Hunger

by Sarah Sexton, Nicholas Hildyard and Larry Lohmann

briefing | published October 1998 | summary | full document

The biotechnology industry claims that genetic engineering in agriculture is necessary to feed a growing world population. Yet, far from preventing world starvation, genetic engineering threatens to exacerbate the social and ecological causes of hunger by forcing farmers to pay for their right to fertile seeds, threatening crop yields, undermining biodiversity and reducing the access of poorer people to food.

Ten Reasons Why GE Crops Won’t Feed the World

by The Corner House

article | published 1998 | summary | full document

There are at least 10 good reasons why the widespread adoption of genetic engineering in agriculture will lead to more hungry people, not fewer.

01. No Patents on Life A Briefing on the Proposed EU Directive on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions

by Alan Simpson, MP, and Nicholas Hildyard and Sarah Sexton

briefing | published September 1997 | summary | full document

Living organisms can now be patented as “inventions” if they are the result of genetic engineering techniques or of the transfer of genes between totally unrelated species of plants, animals and micro-organisms. Yet patents can hinder research, legalise biopiracy and restrict both competition and people’s access to health treatment.

The Eugenics of Normalcy The Politics of Gene Research

by Ruth Hubbard and Elijah Wald with Nicholas Hildyard

article | published September 1993 | summary | full document


home | notifications | search | help | contact |


validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits